2011-11-14 04:53 pm

(no subject)

Vigilantism


Vigilantism is when individual take it upon themselves to take the law in their own hands and punish those who break the law. The word vigilante is derived from the word vigilant meaning keenly watchful and detect danger, or sleeplessly watchful. Many superheroes over the years such as Superman, Batman, Spiderman etc have been based on the idea of men and women taking the law into their own hands and punishing bad guys. Vigilantism plays a huge role in the novel Watchmen which is based on a group of hero’s that take the law into their own hands.

Unlike other superheroes the characters in watchmen are flawed and do not always do the right thing. Some of the heros go as far as hurting innocent people and only do the right thing in the quest for fame. This is a much different perspective on the idea of a hero then has been introduced in the past. Watchmen strongly suggest that taking the law in to your own hands is only good if you don’t break the law yourself.

In the novel Watchmen the US government passes the Keene Act which makes vigilantism by costumed adventurers illegal. Showing us that vigilantism has its draw backs, and that’s why in the real world there are laws against act of vigilantism as well. Random acts of being a good Samaritan is important in our society, but groups of vigilantism ruling our streets can be destructive and that’s what is sometimes depicted in watchmen.
The concept of vigilantism is really the base behind the whole novel. The idea of “who watches the watchmen?” is a main question asked in the novel; If they are watching us who will watch them?
2011-10-07 05:51 pm

Letter from Birmingham Jail

Letter from Birmingham Jail

Martin Luther King Jr’s Letter from Birmingham Jail is a very powerful piece of literature that really grasps the attention of his audience. He speaks with a lot of emotion and frustration as he writes about the problems of segregation in the United States. He inflicts anger and sympathy in his readers and really gives us incite on the difficulties of being a colored person in America.

Letter from Birmingham Jail was originally written in response to eight clergymen who wrote to king opposing his public protests and felt he should take care of his concerns in court. On June 12, 1963 the Letter became published and a second audience was able to read the essay and gain a deeper understanding of racial segregation in America. The broad audience of readers was surely what king wanted out of writing what he says is the longest letter he’s ever written.

King wrote this letter to justify his actions in Birmingham, and why he and several members of his staff engaged in a non violent protest. He explains that segregation is wrong and needs to be changed; he pleads that the black community cannot wait any longer for change and something needs to be done immediately or the protest will eventually become violent as history has proven. He says his civil disobedience not only justified but has a responsibility to disobey unjust laws in order to make a change in our society. Throughout the reading he tells us how deep of an emotional effect segregation has on the black community. He gives us examples like explaining to your daughter or son why they cant go to the amusement park or why they have to sit at the back the bus. These examples really make understand how hard it would be to get treated this way, and why these laws are so unjust.

Throughout Letter from Birmingham jail King makes a lot of comparisons of his actions to the actions of those in the bible. He compares his protest to the prophets of the eighth century who carried the gospel of Jesus to around Rome preaching his word far beyond their village. He sees this as similar to what he is doing protesting to stop segregation. He also compares the crucifixions of Jesus to his getting arrested and accepting punishment for the cause of good. He makes a similar comparison when he talks about Socrates getting poisoned for his new ideas. All of these men were condemned for what they believed, but in the end worked out to change people’s beliefs.

King makes his point very clear in this letter; he makes sure he connected with his reader by using examples and telling us his personal experiences with segregation. He makes it known that they can no longer wait for racial equality. He speaks respectfully and never comes across with aggression or by threats of violence. He simply states his point and makes sure the reader can relate to what he is saying.
2011-09-29 06:17 pm

Genetic after Auschwitz

Genetics after Auschwitz

David Suzuki is a very well known science broadcaster and environmental. He earned a Ph.D. in Zoology and was a professor in the genetics department at UBC. He has earned much respect in science community as a spokes person. In Genetics after Auschwitz he raises some of his concerns about ethics in the field of Genetics. As were reading we notice his voice of concern on the topic; he never places blame on the scientists themselves, and even explains that “they are not evil or fanatics, but ordinary human beings who are totally caught up in their own ambitions and beliefs”.

Suzuki’s audience is mainly his fellow colleagues, but also the general public who may no little or nothing about what role geneticists had during the Holocaust. We don’t study the research of scientist like Josef Mengele, so Suzuki takes it upon himself to tell the public about some of the horrific things he did.

David Suzuki wrote Genetics after Auschwitz to inform people of the ethical issues of scientific studies. He wants us not to forget about the kind of testing that was done at Auschwitz because if we just choose to pretend it never happened and no concerns are raised it may lead to the same thing happening again. He tells us that the scientist are not monsters but they just become so driven and consumed by the scientific problem at hand that they forget about the implications of their actions. Some Scientists try to dismiss the likes of Mengele saying that he wasn’t a geneticist at all, he was just a nut who carried out experiments. They refuse to except that any of their fellow scientist would do anything like that again. This is exactly the attitude Suzuki is trying to stop he believes that Josef Mengel should be included in science courses because it is such an important lesson of the ethics in scientific studies.

Suzuki wants scientists to except there study of selective breeding and there drive for perfect human being may well have lead to the holocaust. Once this is accepted amongst the science community they will be able to teach young scientist ethics that they should always keep in mind throughout their career. Suzuki concludes by telling us it is important to keep doing scientific research but we have to realize some of the negative implications our actions may have.
2011-09-22 08:36 pm

Dumpster diving

Eighner begins by telling us a little bit about how he had always had an interest in dumpsters and even gave us the history of the word. He says “it is a proprietary word belonging to the Dempster Dumpster company” revealing to us even before he had began scavenging as he likes to call it, he had done research about dumpsters. Eighner goes on telling us how he began dumpster diving and we quickly begin to realize he is not ashamed of it and actually takes a kind of pride in what he does. He speaks to us in a very formal way almost as if he were giving a presentation or was a teacher in front of a class room. It almost feels as though you are reading a how to book on dumpster diving.

Eighner is trying to reach people of any age and background. His audience is people that have no experience living on the streets; People that may be disgusted by the thought of getting food and necessities of life from dumpsters. He’s mostly trying to reach the more wealthy members of our society who look down on those who are scavengers.

The purpose is to try to give people incite on how wasteful our society has become. So many of us throw out perfectly good things everyday such as food and clothes without even thinking about it. We sometimes forget how fortunate we are to be able to go out and buy whatever we need for everyday life. Some of us can go out and purchase so much stuff, that we throw things out that could have still been used by those who are in need. He makes a point about college students who return home for reading breaks and will throw out perfectly good food and condiments because they feel it’ll go bad before they return. This is especially true for the students that are still living off of their parent’s dollar; they have no concern about buying more food when they return and would rather not take a chance on food that may go bad. These students are wasteful out of ignorance and carelessness and because for so many of them its daddy’s money they are more careless and have no concerns about where there next meal comes from.

Eighner talks about what he has learned from dumpster diving, most important what is safe to eat. He explains “eating safely from the dumpsters involves three principals using the senses and common sense to evaluate the condition of the found materials, knowing the dumpsters of a given area and checking them regularly, and seeking to always to find the answer to the question why was this discarded”. He makes it quite clear to us that he looks at Dumster diving almost like a career. Hes trying to minimize his consumption on the world by reusing other peoples trash. He feels in the end it is the scavengers who are going to get the last laugh and maybe he is right?